Erik Storm's GoPro camera filmed its own fiery death.

The event was "an honest accident that produced an amazing story," Storm, the owner and lead guide for Hawaii's Kilauea EcoGuides, told me. 

Storm set down his camera to film the lava and then became distracted.

"I was telling a story about the Polynesian goddess Pele to my guests when my GoPro was hit by the lava," he said. " I am very passionate about what I do and sometimes get lost in providing our guests with cultural and scientific information."

In the video, the lava slowly covers the camera and its waterproof housing, and then flames blaze up.

The video dates to August 2016, when Storm took a private tour group to Kilauea volcano and set down his GoPro to film the lava flow. The footage is now going viral thanks to attention from PetaPixel.  

"I thought the camera was for sure done when it was engulfed in the lava," Storm said. "I had a geologist rock hammer with me, and that is how I was able to get it out of the now-cooling rock."

If Storm was surprised to turn around and see his camera buried in lava, another surprise awaited him when he got home. He hammered the now-hardened rock off, and saw the camera's blue Wi-Fi light still blinking. The camera would turn on, but was no longer usable because its lens had melted. But there was good news.

"The SD card popped right out and the footage was intact," Storm said.

Some who've seen the footage don't believe Storm's story.

"I have been accused of doing this intentionally, which is definitely not the case," he said. "I am by no means rich, why would I put a $400 camera in jeopardy intentionally? And if I did this to gain attention why would I have not tried to get all that attention back in August of 2016 when this happened?"

Don't get any bright ideas about creating your own viral video by following Storm's lead.

"It is VERY important to note that flowing lava in Hawaii is extremely sacred and should be respected as such," he warns. "No one should ever poke the lava with anything, cook with the lava, or throw anything into or in front of the flowing lava. ... This is a very sacred place that commands respect."  

Hisense has issued a recall of its French-door fridge with ice maker due to a risk of injury to people using them, the electronics and appliance manufacturer said Thursday.

Consumers were reporting that the hinges were breaking, causing the doors to loosen or detach completely from the fridge. At the time of the recall notice, Hisense identified four reports of minor injuries, the company said. The US Consumer Product Safety Commission noted that Hisense had received a total of 139 reports of the doors loosening or detaching.

The $1,500 refrigerators (model number: HRF266N6CSE) were sold exclusively at Lowe's between August 2020 and February 2022, and have serial numbers C2020050100001 through C2020123109000. You can locate the model and serial number inside the refrigerator above the water dispenser:

If you notice that your refrigerator is included in the recall, you can request a service visit through the manufacturer's recall portal, or call the Hisense Recall Hotline at 1-888-497-1189. A licensed service technician will be able to fix the issue in about 45 minutes, but Hisense warns that scheduling the appointment may take up to four to six weeks, depending on the number of service requests received and the availability of technicians in your area.

"In the meantime, if doors appear to be working properly and are not sagging, you may continue to cautiously use the refrigerator by gently opening and closing the doors," Hisense said.

Tesla continues to clean up in the US electric vehicle market. According to data from Experian, which Automotive News reported on Monday, the electric carmaker's vehicles made up 63% of all EVs registered through the first eight months of the year. The two winners are, unsurprisingly, the more attainable Model Y and Model 3, while their closest EV rival doesn't even come close. That'd be the Chevrolet Bolt EV in third place.

Registrations of the Model Y tallied 105,445 vehicles in the first eight months, with the Model 3 showing 80,681 cars. The Bolt EV is a distant third with 22,799. The Ford Mustang Mach-E, while in fourth, makes an impressive showing after just one model year, however, with 15,938 registered. The Model S ranks ninth behind the Porsche Taycan.

Still, this is very much Tesla's market. The data shows EV registrations doubled year-over-year to make up almost 3% of the new car market. The Model Y made up more than half of that growth -- not just other automakers rolling out their own EVs.

Carmakers plan to keep the accelerator the floor when it comes to EVs. Every major automaker will roll out new electric cars through this decade in hopes to plant a stake and carve out their own territory. With that said, this decade's proving to be quite the upheaval for automakers.

The US Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling Friday overturning Roe v. Wade and allowing states to ban abortion.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization addresses a 2018 Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks, much earlier than the timeline established by Roe and later cases.

"Roe was egregiously wrong from the start," Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion. "Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences."

What exactly did the Supreme Court say in Roe v. Wade? What does the new ruling mean? Here's what you need to know.

What is Dobbs v. Jackson?

In March 2018, the Mississippi Legislature passed HB 1510, the Gestational Age Act, which banned abortion after the first 15 weeks. There are exceptions for a medical emergency or "severe fetal abnormality," but not for cases of rape or incest. Republican Gov. Phil Byrant signed the bill on March 19, 2018.

Jackson Women's Health Organization quickly challenged the law, and in November 2018 the US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi ruled in the clinic's favor. In December 2019, the Fifth Circuit unanimously upheld the lower court's decision.

Mississippi appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court in October 2021 and justices heard oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization in December.

How did the Supreme Court rule in Dobbs?

The high court effectively struck down Roe, which protects a woman's right to an abortion in the first 24 weeks. The new ruling reverts regulation to the states, 26 of which have statutes banning or severely restricting abortion. 

"It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives," Justice Samuel Alito delivered in the opinion for the court, which was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

Chief Justice John Roberts delivered a concurring opinion while the court's three liberal justices -- Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan -- dissented.

What is Roe v. Wade?

Roe v. Wade is the 1973 Supreme Court decision that determined that a woman has a constitutional right to an abortion.

In 1969, attorneys for a pregnant Dallas woman filed suit with the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas challenging the state law banning abortion except when the mother's life was at risk.

The court agreed, but Texas appealed directly to the Supreme Court.

Read More: When Will the Supreme Court Rule on Abortion?

In the opinion for the 7-2 majority, Associate Justice Harry Blackmun wrote that denying a woman the right to choose whether to be pregnant violated the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, which, he wrote, protects "the right to privacy, including a woman's qualified right to terminate her pregnancy." 

The decision to have an abortion during the first trimester was between a woman and her doctor, Blackmun wrote. After that, the state may "regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where necessary … for the preservation of the life or health of the mother."

Who were Roe and Wade?

"Jane Roe" was the pseudonym used by plaintiff Norma McCorvey, who revealed her identity four days after the verdict was announced. 

Henry Wade was the district attorney in Dallas County, Texas, tasked with enforcing Texas' abortion law. 

McCorvey, 22, was a single, unemployed mother of three living in Dallas when she sought to terminate her pregnancy in 1969.

Though she won her case, McCorvey never had the abortion: By the time the Supreme Court rendered its opinion four years later, she had given birth to a girl, whom she put up for adoption.

Was abortion illegal in the US before 1973?

Prior to the 1850s, most US states applied British common law, which permitted abortion before "quickening," when a pregnant woman can first feel the movements of the fetus, at about 15 to 20 weeks.

By 1900, however, most states had classified abortion as a felony except in limited circumstances -- typically if the mother's life was at stake or in the case of rape or incest. 

In 1973, when Roe was argued, only four states -- Alaska, Hawaii, New York and Washington -- had repealed their abortion bans completely. Another 13 had loosened restrictions, according to Planned Parenthood. The decision in Roe v. Wade effectively overturned abortion bans in 30 states.

What other Supreme Court cases have shaped US abortion policy?

Roe v. Wade wasn't the only case impacting a woman's right to choose. A handful of cases before and since have helped establish the current landscape. 

United States v. Vuitch, 1971
Two years prior to Roe, the Supreme Court ruled that a DC law banning abortion was not "unconstitutionally vague" when it made an exception for the health of the mother.

Though Vuitch upheld the district's ban, it established the Supreme Court had jurisdiction to rule on state abortion regulations. 

Planned Parenthood v. Danforth, 1976
Following Roe, the Supreme Court issued several opinions underscoring a woman's right to choose to end a pregnancy. In this ruling, the justices struck down a Missouri statute requiring a married woman to obtain her husband's consent before getting an abortion. 

Harris v. McRae, 1980
The Supreme Court upheld the Hyde Amendment, a congressional measure prohibiting the use of federal funds, namely Medicaid, to pay for an abortion. 

In the majority opinion, Associate Justice Potter Stewart wrote that "it does not follow that a woman's freedom of choice carries with it a constitutional entitlement to the financial resources to avail herself of the full range of protected choices."

City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 1983
This was one of several cases in the 1980s that rejected informed-consent provisions requiring patients be given information on the medical risks and alternatives to abortion and be subject to a 24-hour waiting period. 

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 1992
In this divisive ruling, the court determined state laws could not impose an "undue burden" on a woman's right to have an abortion, a less rigorous standard than the one established by Roe v. Wade. And the responsibility for proving a regulation is extreme falls on the woman, not the government.

Casey involved a challenge to a broad Pennsylvania law that included a 24-hour waiting period and an informed-consent provision -- as well as requirements that a minor obtain permission from at least one parent before obtaining an abortion and for a wife to notify her husband.

All of the provisions of Pennsylvania's abortion law, with the exception of spousal notification, were upheld. 

"The result," wrote the Pew Research Center, "was that a state's interest in and regulation of potential life could now arguably extend throughout a woman's pregnancy." 

The information contained in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as health or medical advice. Always consult a physician or other qualified health provider regarding any questions you may have about a medical condition or health objectives.

Facebook parent Meta has halted development of a much-rumored smartwatch featuring two cameras, Bloomberg reported late Wednesday.

The device, expected to make its debut as early as this summer, had been reported to sport two cameras for taking photos and video, as well as health features like a heart rate monitor. It would reportedly support LTE connectivity at a cost of about $400.

Meta didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Facebook has publicly discussed its work on wrist-worn technology that can sense neural signals and measure hand and finger gestures, with haptic feedback. The company has said it envisions this technology one day working alongside Facebook's upcoming AR smart glasses. 

In 2021, The Information reported that Facebook was working on a smartwatch focused on messaging and health and fitness features.

Shopping for a new laptop can be a little intimidating with the vast range of models out there. You can't tell the difference between an expensive and an affordable laptop by looks alone, and their performance and functionality can vary greatly. However, such a huge market also means that you can find plenty of high-quality laptops at an affordable price, with plenty of great models starting at less than $500. In fact, it might even be worth it to grab one for yourself as an extra device for work or for games.

If you're searching for a laptop under $500, here are the best budget laptops you can buy right now. If you're not sure what to look for in a good budget laptop -- other than price -- jump to our buying advice right below our recommendations. This advice is based on our years of testing and review experience to figure out what to expect from a laptop priced under $500. It will also let you know what to look for if you want to continue your budget laptop hunt on your own. 

Use these picks to sort through the competition. Because there are a lot of cheap laptops that aren't worth it, try not to make rash decisions when buying. 

This story is part of War in Ukraine, CNET's coverage of events there and of the wider effects on the world.

Since Russia invaded Ukraine, the world has gotten a direct view of the war as ordinary Ukrainians document the fighting tearing through their country.

They're not relying on sophisticated gear as they share videos and photos of the destruction and violence. Rather, they're using the tools they've long relied on to communicate: smartphones, social media, messaging apps and a widespread telecommunications network that's so far been spared from devastation.

Footage and information isn't being blocked, so it's flooding out of the country and into the world in a way that hasn't happened at this scale.

The exact amount of videos flowing out of Ukraine is hard to estimate, said Lukas Andriukaitis, associate director of the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, but it's coming from multiple sources. Though Ukrainian soldiers are recording some videos, most of the footage is coming from everyday people. 

"There is a huge influx for sure," Andriukaitis said. "Now, when the occupying forces are going through Ukrainian towns and villages, civilians are recording them."

The war in Ukraine is the latest example of how current events, from the Black Lives Matter protests of 2020 to the deadly riot at the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, are being broadcast in real time. Viewers around the world aren't waiting for the nightly news, or even for journalistic authority, to absorb a rapidly changing conflict. They're getting raw information in video footage, photos and frontline dispatches from common people. 

The overall effect is a daily flood of footage that's exposed the world to tragedy and resolve in a way that can't be done by official government statements or polished news reports. And this sets the Ukraine war apart from other recent conflicts, like the Armenian-Azerbaijan border strife, where much of the phone-recorded footage is taken by soldiers. In Ukraine, civilians are taking most of the videos, and forensic specialists say that little, if any, of the footage is doctored. 

"We are not seeing much inauthentic or old video content in this conflict," Benjamin Strick, director of investigations at the Centre for Information Resilience, told CNET over email. His organization is monitoring footage coming from Ukraine. "Much of the footage we are seeing actually comes from civilians filming on the ground. ... We are seeing primarily footage filmed from balconies, outside of windows, dashcams, or just passersby on the street that are filming these events." 

Spreading the word, staying in touch, checking if alive

Since the invasion, smartphones have become much more than just a way for Ukrainians to gossip with friends or order dinner. They've been a lifeline for people to understand what's happening elsewhere in the country and to check on the safety of friends and family. 

Natalie Jaresko, former finance minister of Ukraine, likens the ability to communicate to "another form of air."

"At night, when you're at the bunker, you don't have a connection. And those hours are the most difficult because you're so alone other than the people who are in the bomb shelter with you," Jaresko told CNET's Roger Cheng. "But when you come out, you have everyone's outpouring of love and concern right there. And you can return to that communication with the people you love."

Ukrainians have been using a broad mix of mobile apps and tools to stay in touch, from messaging and social media app Telegram to video and text chat service Viber to WhatsApp to Facebook Messenger to Signal to Twitter and more. Viber is installed on 98% of smartphones in Ukraine. The company behind the app says that since the start of the war, it's seen a more than 200% increase in both audio messages and calls.

No matter the app, though, Ukrainians are using these tools to contact friends and family both domestically and abroad, and to navigate with maps and GPS to escape the country. And for the 2 million refugees like Jaresko who've left Ukraine, they use them to check if loved ones back home are OK.

"I can tell whether they're alive or dead at any given time, where they physically are," Jaresko said.

Mobile access continues, so long as the network stays up

Depending on who you ask, it's either an oversight or a Russian strategic move that Ukrainian networks are still functioning. Telecom service has been mostly spared from the devastation affecting parts of the country, but some experts suspect that the communications infrastructure used by civilians and military alike has been deliberately left intact so Russians can listen in, as Politico reported last week. 

"I'm a little surprised that Russians haven't screwed with [Ukraine's mobile network] more, frankly," said James Lewis, senior vice president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "But I assume that means they're collecting [data] off it."

Network redundancy makes today's mobile networks tougher to disrupt than landline systems. If one cell tower gets knocked out, your phone just connects to another one. Lewis has a list of possibilities of why Russia hasn't crippled Ukraine's network with physical and cyberattacks, but he also noted that telecoms from other European countries are helping from afar to keep phone calls and data flowing. 

Lifecell, the third-largest telecom in Ukraine, confirmed to CNET over email that it's registered a significant increase in calls and data, as many subscribers have lost Wi-Fi access or are hiding in bomb shelters. Just as foreign telecoms have stopped charging for calls and data into Ukraine, Lifecell has given subscribers some free minutes and data, with more portioned out to military, law enforcement and emergency personnel.

Still, some regions enduring the brunt of the Russian shelling and destruction, including the cities of Kharkiv, Chernihiv, Luhansk and Donetsk in the disputed Donbas region, and parts of Kyiv, have lost coverage, Lifecell confirmed. National telecoms operator Ukrtelecom, which oversees mobile and internet service, had restored up to 77% of its regional communication nodes by Thursday, after reported combat damage earlier in the week caused outages in some cities.

But other observers believe communications are still up because Russia underestimated Ukrainian resistance. Alex Bornyakov, Ukrainian deputy minister of digital transformation, told CNET over email that Russian forces didn't initially attack any communication channels or physical infrastructure, but that that's changed as they've moved deeper into the country.

"The first week, in most of the country, we still had good reception and the internet was working fine," Bornyakov said. "Once they approached the big cities, they tried to cut [connectivity]. People instantly [started] repairing it."

But as bombing and shelling has intensified in some cities, the situation has become more volatile. "They're just bombing [networks] instantly, and [Ukrainians] are unable to fix it," Bornyakov said. 

Chat app lifeline: Is what's happening really happening?

Beyond using chat apps and social media to stay in touch, Ukrainians are tapping them to record the war and share information on it with one another and the outside world. Videos and images appear on Twitter and online forums like Reddit, but many posts spread through the country first on Telegram, Ukrainians' platform of choice for consuming news. Ukrainian government ministries, news organizations and enterprising individuals have spread the content further in scrollable feeds followed by millions of people.

Some of the biggest channels are now focusing on the war. Ukraine Now, one of the largest in the country with 1.1 million subscribers, was a verified account publishing official COVID-19 pandemic information until it pivoted to sharing invasion updates from the government and other sources. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy uploads his video speeches to the 1.5 million people following his own channel. And videos taken by civilians are published by the likes of Ukrainian news outlet Mirror Weekly's channel before they're posted elsewhere online.

This flood of information goes straight to Ukrainian smartphones, but not all of it is accurate, either because of unintentional mistakes in the fog of war or because of intentional deception. According to a recent report from the University of Texas, Ukrainian users surveyed were more trusting of information they came across on encrypted messaging apps like Telegram, Viber and Signal due to their privacy features, making encrypted messaging apps ripe for propaganda campaigns. 

Sam Woolley, co-author of the report and program director of the propaganda research team at the university's Center for Media Engagement, says misinformation and propaganda still jam Ukrainian messaging apps today. Meanwhile, he says, Ukraine has a very advanced digital propaganda system and is using it to push back on Russian propaganda via its social media accounts and channels, and to call attention to devastating attacks while asking other countries to intervene.

"In a lot of ways, we're seeing a conflict play out on social media, but also on chat apps, in a way we really haven't before," Woolley said.

Verified video: A process between citizens and Western eyes

Due to video footage flooding the internet, the world has seen Russian tanks and aircraft moving through Ukraine, and it's witnessed fires at nuclear power plants and holes punched in apartments. The risky part? Clips can be faked, years old or taken from other conflicts. A patchwork effort of international groups is working to verify the authenticity of videos out of Ukraine and create resources to know what's happening where.

One of the easiest to follow is the Russia-Ukraine Monitor Map, which tags videos to locations in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia with context and a warning for severity of graphic content. The map is a collaboration between the Centre for Information Resilience and the open-source community, including Bellingcat, a collective of experts that for years has released disinformation reports and media authenticity tips. 

Though some footage has been manipulated or been recirculated from older conflicts such as the ongoing Syrian civil war, the CIR's Strick said video verifiers aren't seeing much inauthentic or old video content. With so many Ukrainians uploading video, the sheer volume is making it easier to authenticate footage compared with videos from other conflict zones like Cameroon, Sudan, Libya, Yemen and others that CIR monitors.

"There is an extremely overwhelming amount of footage available on Russia's invasion of Ukraine, even right down to specific incidents where we are getting two, three, even four alternative angles of a specific attack. Whereas in Myanmar or Afghanistan, we sometimes struggle to get one," Strick told CNET over email. "The footage from Ukraine is often very clear, quite high definition and often much easier to verify than some areas."

Digital Forensic Research Lab Associate Director Andriukaitis described another factor he says has left Ukrainian citizens in control of the narrative. Stricter mobile phone discipline from soldiers -- notably reports of Russian troops leaving their cell phones at the border before stepping into Ukraine -- means most videos seen today come directly from citizens as they record the destruction of their cities from their balconies and streets.

"One thing that is different is that the Russian military is very, very strict with their soldiers not using phones. It makes sense. It's for operational security," Andriukaitis said. 

Verifying videos, though, is an onerous process, and not everything can be checked. Analysts must scrutinize details like uniforms, debris, damage and lengths of shadows, as well as compare the background to the real-world locations purportedly depicted in the video. Video descriptions and comments on social media help with context, along with metadata embedded in photos and videos, if recorders haven't stripped it to avoid government tracking. 

As the next few weeks develop, the only thing for certain is that more footage will be recorded and uploaded for the world to see, at least as long as cell service remains in Ukraine. And as that footage comes, Andriukaitis and his peers will continue to choose which videos to verify and archive, while avoiding tactical troop movements. The Kremlin has denied that Russia is targeting noncombatants, but Andriukaitis and peers are focusing on the bombing of civilians and other possible war crimes.

"We see a lot of value in that because this will stay in the archives," Andriukaitis said. "And at some point, Russians will have to answer for their crimes."

The stakes for Survivor Series this year aren't high, but that doesn't mean we can't have fun. That's pretty much the sell for Survivor Series, which takes place on Sunday, Nov. 21, at New York's Barclay's Center. It's WWE's annual Raw versus SmackDown show, with the headlining match pitting WWE Champion Big E against Universal Champion Roman Reigns.

Perhaps the match that may end up getting more attention is Raw Women's Champion Becky Lynch's bout against SmackDown Women's Champion Charlotte Flair, with their apparent backstage dramas sparking huge interest in the wrestling world.

But of course, it woudln't be Survivor Series without 5-on-5 elimination matches. We'll have two such eliminator matches, one that pits Raw men against SmackDown men and another featuring Raw women facing a team of women from SmackDown. True, the whole "brand versus brand" thing is a bit contrived and definitely lacks stakes. But in spite of that, the wrestling in these champion versus champion matches is usually a bunch of fun.

The show also marks 25 years since The Rock's debut, and to celebrate there's a 25-man battle royale -- one person for every year of Rock, I suppose. Who knows, maybe we'll even catch a glimpse of The Great One on Sunday. 

Match card

• WWE Champion Big E vs. Universal Champion Roman Reigns.
• Raw Women's Champion Becky Lynch vs. SmackDown Women's Champion Charlotte Flair.
• United States Champion Damian Priest vs. Shinsuke Nakamura.
• Seth Rollins, Finn Balor, Kevin Owens, Austin Theory and Bobby Lashley (Team Raw) vs. Drew McIntyre, Jeff Hardy, Xavier Woods, Happy Corbin and Sheamus (Team SmackDown).
  
• Bianca Belair, Rhea Ripley, Liv Morgan, Carmella and Queen Zelina (Team Raw) vs. Sasha Banks, Shayna Baszler, Shotzi Blackheart, Natalya and Toni Storm (Team SmackDown).
  
• Raw Tag Team Champions Randy Orton and Riddle vs. SmackDown Tag Team Champions The Usos.
• 25 Man battle royale.

How to watch: Peacock, WWE Network

As you probably know by now, Peacock is the new home of WWE's pay-per-views. The WWE Network has in essence migrated to NBC's Peacock streaming service and that's where you'll go to watch Survivor Series 2021. Peacock has three tiers: Free, Premium and Premium Plus. To watch WWE content, you'll need a Premium subscription. The good news is that'll set you back $5 a month, less than the $10 for WWE Network. 

If you're outside of the US, you'll watch Survivor Series 2021 on the WWE Network as usual. 

Start times 

Survivor Series 2021 takes place at New York's, Barclay's Arena on Nov. 21. For those without a live ticket, it starts at 5 p.m. PT/8 p.m ET. Grappling fans across the pond will have to stay up late, as the show starts at 1 a.m. UK time. In Australia, Survivor Series begins at 12 a.m. AEDT on Monday.   

We didn't see any particularly great Apple Pencil deals for Prime Day, but Verizon is giving you the chance to save on essential iPad accessories today. Right now, when you add an Apple Pencil 2 to your cart along with either the 11-inch or 12.9-inch Magic Keyboard for iPad, you'll save 30%. For the smaller model, that equates to a $129 discount and an overall bundle price of $300. Go for the larger keyboard and you'll save $144, dropping the bundle price to $335 from $479.

Apple's Magic Keyboard works with all iPad Pro models released since 2018 and the 11-inch version is also compatible with both fourth- and fifth-gen iPad Air models. The accessory attaches magnetically to your iPad and links up via the Smart Connector on the back of the device for seamless connectivity and power. That means there's no need to pair via Bluetooth and no need to charge the keyboard. There's also a USB-C port integrated into the Magic Keyboard for a convenient way to pass power through to your iPad.

The second-gen Apple Pencil offers precise tilt and pressure sensitivity plus a lag-free experience so you'll be able to paint, doodle, and write across a bunch of apps on your iPad. It works with the same iPad models that the Magic Keyboard supports meaning you can completely transform the way you use your device with today's bundle deals.